I think I've got the best case:LMAO, I think I'm onto something. A massive name changing campaign. Everyone should petition the court to change our last names to "Bank".
US Bank v wanda robo Bank
US Bank v krafty krab Bank
isisis Bank v Bank of America
Lastly... Is everyone staying warm? It’s freezing & nasty here. The one nice thing, is they are already putting up Christmas decorations & it’s the time of the year that the city actually cleans the streets for tourism.
Without knowing the full context, it could actually be useful for them. Not necessarily so, but it could be. Example:I have a dumb question because I'm dealing with a dumb agency. Of what relevance is a PSA that wasn't even executed by the agency? Like what was that meant to prove? LMAO
Without knowing the full context, it could actually be useful for them. Not necessarily so, but it could be. Example:
Pretender Lender A claims to assign the "loan" to Swindler B. Swindler B then sells it off to a fake trustee for a fake trust--we'll call it Crook C. Crook C then assigns servicing authority to the Dumb Agency D that you're dealing with. While the PSA that names Crook C does not name Dumb Agency D, D can then come along and produce a doctored POA between C and D. This could be a step for them trying to prove chain of title, and then agency relationship from there.
Of course, the parties are rather interchangeable in my example, they all seem to blur together into one big fat ball of con artists and scammers really. But I hope you get the idea, lol
In the same sense that you cannot challenge the contract because you're not a party to it, they also cannot rely on the contract or enforce a benefit of the contract because THEY are not a party to it. lol that's ridiculous.....LMAO.
They're making the same stupid argument they make when you challenge Assignments. You can't challenge the Assignment because you are not a party. It's so dumb. So now they're trying to say they can enforce the PSA & somehow it has some legal effect, when it wasn't even executed by HUD. If anything they're making my Negligence Counts stronger not weaker. Big dummies.
Oh it's even more ridiculous. 3 pieces of evidence:In the same sense that you cannot challenge the contract because you're not a party to it, they also cannot rely on the contract or enforce a benefit of the contract because THEY are not a party to it. lol that's ridiculous.....