Hi Jeffrey. I re-read the thread last nite before posting, including your responses to see if I had missed anything, or was misunderstanding anything. I think you are wrong on your conclusion because one block in your foundation is misplaced. In every state, a contract is a contract. However, how a contract is enforced varies from state to state. You are correct that the debt was owed, however, you are forgetting that the debt was secured by an asset. In this case, the asset was worth more than the debt, (although that is not usually the case). In Pa., the remedy allowed by statute when a person falls behind on payments involves a federal and state act 91 notice giving an opportunity to core the DEFAULT. Next comes a formal (including being served by the sheriff) judicial proceeding where the judge decides who is right. The judge issues a decision, usually in behalf of the lender, and this is called a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT. It has now been determined that the borrower is behind by a certain amount, and the lender now has legal right to sell the asset to offset the amount of the default. The default judgement does not establish a net amount or any amount owed to the lender, it only gives them the right to continue the process of settling their debt. They can now sell the asset to offset the debt. AFTER THE ASSET IS SOLD then a final accounting of who owes what can happen. There has been no determination by anyone prior to this point as to who owes whom what. At this point I do not owe them a debt as you suggest. At some future time, the lender , if they want to, can proceed back to court a second time for a DEFICIENCY judgement if they want to spend the time and money to do so. Again, in the case of Pa., they have 6 months to do so. If they do not do that, then no further contractual or legal obligation between the lender and borrower exists.
Regarding the 1099c, again, if no debt has been established by a court or other statutory authority, then there is no debt to forgive, therefore no tax to be paid.
And lastly, anytime a person has been damaged, they can ask the court to correct the situation, In Pa., no debt or paper has been generated until a DEFICIENCY judgement has been issued, so Fannie is trying to collect on something that does not exist, it's fraud, deceptive or a scam. Whatever label you put on it, it is wrong, and sooner or later it will come out.
Elsewhere on this board, someone stated that SRG is an aboveboard collection agency, if I get a minute, I will try to trace that back and comment on that as well, because they are not
Hope this fills the crack in your foundation, and helps you continue in the work you are doing to help other people