Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Senior Member goldie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,943

    CA Sues MERS - Qui Tam

    <CENTER>JUST IN: WILL THIS BE ONE OF THE LAST SHOES TO DROP?</CENTER>
    California is following in the footsteps of Tennessee. Recent Sup. Ct. rulings held that MERS is not the holder in due course (real party in interest) of any property and never was. This can have devastating repercussions for the mortgage industry, not just MERS, because there is no valid chain of title. People who are being foreclosed upon, or have been foreclosed upon, now have an equitable remedy. These people should now be able to win in court and have their mortgage nightmares settled. Some people are able to keep their homes, as banks fear losing far more in class-action suits...

    Mortgage Servicing Fraud

    http://www.msfraud.org/law/lounge/Ca...rding-Fees.pdf

  2. #2
    LoanSafe Guide Evan Bedard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    San Diego, California
    Posts
    16,101

    Re: CA Sues MERS - Qui Tam

    Thanks for sharing this Goldie! Very interesting read!
    Keep Fighting!

    Evan Bedard
    LoanSafe.org Support Team

    The comments by me and the materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Most of the information you find here is easily available on the internet. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. Please Read our Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer Here.

  3. #3
    Senior Member flippinwacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    4 seasons Idago
    Posts
    525

    Re: CA Sues MERS - Qui Tam

    Quote Originally Posted by goldie View Post
    <CENTER>JUST IN: WILL THIS BE ONE OF THE LAST SHOES TO DROP?</CENTER>
    California is following in the footsteps of Tennessee. Recent Sup. Ct. rulings held that MERS is not the holder in due course (real party in interest) of any property and never was. This can have devastating repercussions for the mortgage industry, not just MERS, because there is no valid chain of title. People who are being foreclosed upon, or have been foreclosed upon, now have an equitable remedy. These people should now be able to win in court and have their mortgage nightmares settled. Some people are able to keep their homes, as banks fear losing far more in class-action suits...

    Mortgage Servicing Fraud

    http://www.msfraud.org/law/lounge/Ca...rding-Fees.pdf

    This is incredible! Thanks goldie! Hopefully this pans out!

  4. #4
    Junior Member MERSCORP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3

    Reply from MERS

    Residential mortgage loans typically consist of two elements: 1) a note between the lender and the borrower that sets forth the terms of the loan and establishes the obligation to repay the loan to purchase a property; and 2) a security instrument which, depending on the state, may be called a “mortgage” or a “deed of trust.” The security instrument is recorded in the county land records, telling the world that there is a lien on the borrower’s property. This lien allows the property to be foreclosed upon and sold if the borrower defaults on her or his obligation to repay the promissory note.

    The homebuyer at the closing table signs the security instrument (“mortgage” or “deed of trust”). By signing this document, the lender and the borrower agree to appoint Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) as the mortgagee as nominee for the lender and the lender’s successors and assigns. By doing so, the borrower grants the mortgage lien to the property to MERS, and the security instrument is recorded in the county land records. As long as the sale of note involves a member of MERS, MERS remains the mortgagee of record, and continues to act as a nominee for the new note-holder.

    When a borrower signs the mortgage security instrument at closing, they grant and convey the legal title to the mortgage to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) and MERS is the mortgagee. As the agent for the promissory note owner, upon instructions from the owner, MERS will commence a foreclosure. The mortgage instrument states that MERS has the right to foreclose and sell the property. Courts around the country have repeatedly upheld and recognized this right.

    In addition, the City of Los Angeles recently accepted the MERS System as an alternate registry of foreclosed and vacant properties. More information on this new ordinance can be found here:
    MERS - Newsroom - Press Release Details

  5. #5
    Senior Member goldie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,943
    Quote Originally Posted by MERSCORP View Post
    Residential mortgage loans typically consist of two elements: 1) a note between the lender and the borrower that sets forth the terms of the loan and establishes the obligation to repay the loan to purchase a property; and 2) a security instrument which, depending on the state, may be called a “mortgage” or a “deed of trust.” The security instrument is recorded in the county land records, telling the world that there is a lien on the borrower’s property. This lien allows the property to be foreclosed upon and sold if the borrower defaults on her or his obligation to repay the promissory note.

    The homebuyer at the closing table signs the security instrument (“mortgage” or “deed of trust”). By signing this document, the lender and the borrower agree to appoint Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) as the mortgagee as nominee for the lender and the lender’s successors and assigns. By doing so, the borrower grants the mortgage lien to the property to MERS, and the security instrument is recorded in the county land records. As long as the sale of note involves a member of MERS, MERS remains the mortgagee of record, and continues to act as a nominee for the new note-holder.

    When a borrower signs the mortgage security instrument at closing, they grant and convey the legal title to the mortgage to Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. (MERS) and MERS is the mortgagee. As the agent for the promissory note owner, upon instructions from the owner, MERS will commence a foreclosure. The mortgage instrument states that MERS has the right to foreclose and sell the property. Courts around the country have repeatedly upheld and recognized this right.

    In addition, the City of Los Angeles recently accepted the MERS System as an alternate registry of foreclosed and vacant properties. More information on this new ordinance can be found here:
    MERS - Newsroom - Press Release Details
    Give up the double-speak buddy, your company is on its way out. The courts are wising up to your games. I was NEVER explained what MERS was, nor did I even know you were on my mortgage. I certainly did not agree to it and the title officer did not explain it EVER. I did not EVER agree to MERS swindling our local recorder clerk out of rightful fees due. MERS did not save me any money on my title fees - I paid full title fees. I repeat, you and your big bankster buddies are on their way out. Better get used to eating Ramen.

  6. #6
    Senior Member goldie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    1,943
    Homeowners

    MERS: Myths, Misconceptions, and Realities – A REBUTTAL | Chink in the Armor

    62 million homes! Why all the scheming, fraudulent assignments, fake documents, non-existant "employees" (robo-signers) and notaries and collusion with the foreclosure mills? If everything is on the up and up and legal, why ALL of this? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?????

  7. #7
    Senior Member flippinwacko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    4 seasons Idago
    Posts
    525
    EXCELLANT! Does this mean MERS will start recording TRUE securitized loan purchase transfers?

    Also, just to clarify, this is an ordinace adopted by the "CITY" of Los Angeles...This will hopefully require the true Trustee to finally start maintaining the abandoned properties, as well as prevent squaters from assuming abandoned properties.

    Recordation of Transfer of Loans
    For loan purchasers or trustees of securitized loans, the Ordinance contains new requirements for the assignment of recorded security instruments. Within 10 days of the transfer of a loan and/or deed of trust secured by residential real property located in the City, the new beneficiary or trustee must record with the Los Angeles County Recorder’s Office assignment documentation containing the name of the new beneficiary and the mailing address and contact phone number of the party responsible for receiving loan payments. Although assignment documentation reflecting such a transfer would normally be recorded with the county in any event, loan purchasers and loan servicers in particular should be mindful of the new timing and disclosure requirements.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles and graphics (but not our photographs or our blog) for free. You just have to credit us and link to us, and you can't edit our material or sell it separately. If you're republishing online, you have to include all links. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.)
© Design & Copyright MoeSeo | Privacy | Contact