Home Loans and Support

BK, Satisfied 1st, Settled 2nd, and a new mortgage?

Discussion in 'Mortgage Brokers' started by roadtofreedom, Aug 23, 2013.

  1. roadtofreedom

    roadtofreedom LoanSafe Member

    I filed individual BK7 back in 2009. There were two mortgage included but we "stayed and paid". Last year I began the process of settling the second mortgage because we were moving across the country and wanted to be able to sell the house. They finally agreed, they filed a lien release that shows they "received full payment and satisfaction of the same", and we have since moved. The old house is under contract now and will close next week most likely, which will satisfy the 1st.

    On my credit reports, the 2nd mortgage trade lines are still showing Included in Bankruptcy as they should be. However, as an added twist - my wife did NOT file although she was on the 2nd. They incorrectly updated her trade line when I filed, which we disputed and it's been removed from 2 of the 3 CRAs. I've since disputed the third one again but it seems like a huge gamble as to how it will come back.

    We are looking to buy a house in our new home state. The BK7 is seasoned enough for a conventional loan and we qualify credit and income wise.

    I've been told by some that the settlement will cause an issue with underwriting and I'm a little worried. It wasn't a short sale, DIL, or foreclosure and no where on the URLA does it ask if you've settled recently.

    Is this a show-stopper? Will the verbiage in the lien release be enough to move forward? Will getting this removed from that last CRA be sufficient to not draw additional attention during underwriting? We are looking to build and I don't want to get 8 months into this process just to find we can't close.
  2. TomEason

    TomEason LoanSafe Guide Staff Member

    roadtofreedom

    Thanks for your post. The answers to all your questions can be provided by an experienced loan broker/loan officer. I recommend you speak with at least two, as those firms likely use different lenders, each of whom has their own underwriting criteria. Loan brokers / loan officers do this stuff all the time. After all, they won't be paid unless and until they secure a new loan for a client.
  3. roadtofreedom

    roadtofreedom LoanSafe Member

    Thanks Tom. I'm working with two already and have received "pre-qualification", which I know doesn't amount to much. The next step is pre-approval and I was told they would get UW sign-off. The problem is I will be signing a contract for new construction in between with a $5,000 deposit. I'll need to confirm under which circumstances, if any, that is refundable.

    I guess I need to know how forthcoming I need to be in this situation. If it's not reporting on the CRAs, the lien shows released and the house is sold, I don't think it will come up. However if that trade line for my wife remains, or worse is noted as a charge off or something, I know for a fact it will come up. Should I be completely open about this? I don't want to lie or commit fraud but at the same time I'm not one to draw unnecessary scrutiny if I can avoid it.
  4. TomEason

    TomEason LoanSafe Guide Staff Member

    roadtofreedom

    Thanks for your post. Glad you've already consulted with lenders, and that pre-approval is under way. I presume that will be for a "take-out" loan, i.e. permanent financing. But you'll need a construction loan first, and that's your concern. You might want to consult with a RE lawyer who's practice includes residential construction loans and contracts. As for your credit file, I might suggest you NOT bother disputing again with the CRA, but have your wife send a dispute letter to the creditor (the furnisher of credit info), demanding they correct their report and no longer report that item as a "charge-off." The reason is this. Although the CRA can remove an item from your wife's file, the CRA can't prevent that derog from reappearing, and it likely will because credit info furnishers (creditors) typically report on their accounts to the CRAs every 30 days. In that letter to the creditor, you might cite the applicable provision of the FCRA, if there is one. And if there isn't, you might just make something up. Good luck.
    Last edited: Aug 23, 2013
  5. enstar

    enstar LoanSafe Member

    Just interested as to if you did receive financing? I am in the process of settling my second mortgage and want to try to refinance my first after the settlement. I have been told by a loan officer that mortgage companies consider settlement the same as a short sale and that it will take 3 years to qualify for a refinance after the settlement.
  6. LibelFreeZone

    LibelFreeZone LoanSafe Member

    Q: I've been told by some that the settlement will cause an issue with underwriting and I'm a little worried. It wasn't a short sale, DIL, or foreclosure and no where on the URLA does it ask if you've settled recently.

    "Settled for less than owed" is considered the same as a short sale--with a 2-year waiting period. Here's the pertinent portion of Fannie Mae guidelines.

    https://www.fanniemae.com/content/tool/du-clarification-foreclosure-preforeclosure-sale.pdf

Share This Page

COMPANY LINKS

TESTIMONIALS

"Hello Moe, I just wanted to tell you, your website has saved my life (literally), I stumbled on your site in the middle of losing my home, I was able to network with people going through the same thing as I am. I didn't feel alone anymore, I have tried to give back and counsel those that haven't walked in my shoes yet. We hear so much about what is wrong with America, I just wanted you to know, you are whats "right" with America."

Nina Mitchell
Loansafe & MoeSeo Inc. © 2014 | LoanSafe.org is not a bank, lender, mortgage broker, law firm or affiliated with the US Government. Privacy Policy