RestReportMatters
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Senior Member GreenRose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    47

    Angry Report: Treasury Snubs Struggling Homeowners

    Report: Treasury Snubs Struggling Homeowners

    Important TARP funds targeted for homeowners have not been released

    - Common Dreams staff


    Only 3 percent of the $7.6 billion in TARP funds that are targeted for troubled homeowners facing foreclosure have been spent, according to a report by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Fund.The Hardest Hit Fund was created in 2010 to help struggling homeowners, but the Treasury Department has failed to distribute the vast majority of the money in the last two years due to "a lack of comprehensive planning," the report said.

    "Look at the TARP money that goes out to the banks," said Special Inspector General Christy Romero in an interview with The Huffington Post. "That goes out in a matter of days. This has been two years and only 3 percent of these funds have trickled out to homeowners."
    Chris Hayes, a host at MSNBC, said in a Tweet responding to the report, that the White House's "foreclosure mitigation failure has been so egregious and cruel, it makes me question their motives on everything."
    The report is available here.


    NY Times: Treasury Faulted in Effort to Relieve Homeowners
    A fund to support homeowners in the communities hit hardest by the collapse of the housing bubble has disbursed just 3 percent of its budget and aided only 30,640 homeowners in the two years since its creation, according to a report released on Thursday by a federal watchdog office.
    The Hardest Hit Fund, which was created in the spring of 2010, grants money to state housing finance agencies for efforts to help families that are facing foreclosure. It has “experienced significant delay” because of “a lack of comprehensive planning” by the Treasury Department and limited participation by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the large mortgage servicers, said the report by the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
    “TARP wasn’t supposed to be just a bank bailout,” said Christy L. Romero, the special inspector general for TARP, in an interview. “It was specifically designed with the goal of helping homeowners, and our concern is that that goal may not be met.”
    As of the end of 2011, the Hardest Hit Fund had spent $217.4 million out of its $7.6 billion budget, the report found. The program is intended to reach homeowners who are unemployed, or living in areas with high unemployment rates or steeply falling home values.
    The report is just the latest to criticize the Obama administration’s efforts to relieve homeowners battered by the nationwide drop in housing prices and the broader recession. The office of the special inspector general has repeatedly criticized Treasury’s management of the Home Affordable Modification Program, Washington’s main initiative to prevent foreclosures.
    The Treasury Department had estimated that the program would reach three million to four million homeowners. It has aided fewer than a million, though the program has been completing more and more permanent modifications recently.
    * * *
    Huffington Post: TARP Bailout Money Fails To Reach Neediest Homeowners After Two Years: Report
    The Hardest Hit Fund, a $7.6 billion initiative established by the federal government in February 2010 to help families in states most crippled by the collapsed housing market, has distributed just 3 percent of its money -- or $217.4 million -- to help homeowners, according to a report released Thursday by the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Fund, or SIGTARP.
    "Look at the TARP money that goes out to the banks," said Special Inspector General Christy Romero in an interview with The Huffington Post. "That goes out in a matter of days. This has been two years and only 3 percent of these funds have trickled out to homeowners."
    The Hardest Hit Fund has helped just slightly more than 30,000 homeowners, or 7 percent of the roughly 480,000 homeowners targeted for assistance by the end of 2017 when the program expires, according to the report. The program is funded by TARP, the 2008 legislation that has provided a $600 billion to bail out various banks and other companies in the wake of the nation's financial crisis.
    "The Hardest Hit Fund is really struggling to get off the ground and it's a real concern about whether this money can get out to these homeowners," Romero said.
    The 76-page report reads like the autopsy of a dead housing program, placing the blame for the program's paltry performance squarely on the Treasury Department, the government agency responsible for TARP and, in turn, the Hardest Hit program.
    According to the report, Treasury initially dragged its heels in getting the largest mortgage servicers to participate in the initiative, instead relying on the individual states to broker arrangements with the servicers. Some of the states lacked the necessary clout to secure servicer participation, thus limiting the program's ability to reach needy homeowners, concluded the report.

  2. #2
    Senior Member GreenRose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    47
    I read this article today and decided that members of this board would find it as interesting as I did.

  3. #3
    Senior Member davephx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,432
    I don't see how your can blame Treasury of Obama unless you just don't want facts to get in the way.

    HAMP and Hardest Hit and all the zillions of other programs are great!!!! The banks are required to participate and follow the directives per their Participation Agreements they signed as part of the TARP rescue.

    They refuse to follow all the HAMP directives, refuse to participate in the Hardest Hit fund programs of most states and since it is not a law only an agreement virtually nothing Treasury can do.

    Now all but one bank has paid back TARP at a huge profit to taxpayers but there is no cancel clause in the agreement after repay.

  4. #4
    Senior Member PatZZ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Nearby
    Posts
    100
    But there are a boatload of servicers/lenders who ARE participating. Much of the problem now stems from the state Housing Agencies denying the majority of applicants based on parameters set by the state. New Jersey denied 99% of their apps in the 1st quarter they reported. TARP allowed the states to set their own criteria for eligibility and qualification. New Jersey is taking 6 months or longer to even review the applications and they are denying people for credit reasons yet they never said credit was a factor when people applied. They make credit an excuse on the back end - (or claim to make it an excuse). Credit should only be an issue for a refinance. A woman said she was denied due to credit with a 610 score. That's insane.

    They just do not want to give the people the money. Period.

    http://newjerseyhomekeeperprogram.in...sey-homekeeper

  5. #5
    Senior Member davephx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    5,432
    "TARP allowed the states to set their own criteria for eligibility and qualification"

    So how can one blame Treasury? In theory this was a good idea let the states control the funds and set up criteria.

    In AZ great program based on subsidizing principal reductions up to $50,000 per mortgage. But they ignored the fact that the servicing banks could care less about modifying since they make fees to foreclose - and would not participate in any such program.

    I have no idea why many states that were allocated hardest-hit funds developed programs that were about worthless. But not Treasuries fault. And you can not force a bank to break contract law and modify - - Under HAMP the banks AGREED BY CONTRACT to do HAMP's and follow Treasury Hamp_Admin/Fannie etc directives. But they ignore them also dispite their agreements when got TARP funds (now paid back at huge profit to Treasury/taxpayer).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Unless otherwise noted, you can republish our articles and graphics (but not our photographs or our blog) for free. You just have to credit us and link to us, and you can't edit our material or sell it separately. If you're republishing online, you have to include all links. (We're licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.)
© Design & Copyright MoeSeo | Privacy | Contact