ticgroup - I've managed to do this myself for an entire year now. Just imagine, these "trustee delay services" charge an upfront fee & sometimes upwards of 1,000 per month. Why would I shell out that money when I knew I was smart enough to figure it out myself. You are correct in that these services act as though it's a closely guarded secret. One you understand the foreclosure laws of your state, it's pretty easy to challenge the trustee.
In non-judicial states you can require the trustee to verify a comprehensive list of issues related to the legal nature of the foreclosure proceedings enacted by the lender, which as a byproduct, you as the homeowner still retain full ownership of the property and live there comfortably. Since the trustee assumes the liability in auctioning the property, they will not foreclose on the property if there is a potential violation pointed out to them prior to the Auction Sale Date as they could face sanctions.
To institute a valid foreclosure proceeding, they must be able to establish compliance with CCC 3-301, at commencement of the foreclosure proceeding, the recording of the notice of default, and throughout the proceedings until sale date. So then the following most basic requirements of CCC 3-301(a) or CCC 3-301(b) must be met:
3-301(a), Holder of the instrument: Was the entity filing the Notice of Default and subsequent actions, the Holder of the Note the entire time? This analysis turns on transfer and possession, and under California law, there are two requirements for a person to qualify as a Holder:
(a) ACTUAL POSSESSION: the person must be in actual physical possession of the instrument, and
(b) TRANSFER BY ENDORSEMENT: the instrument must be payable to that person where the transferor must indorse the instrument to make it payable to the transferee See CComC § 1201(20); See CComC § 3205(a);
So if you are facing foreclosure, demand inspection of the original note. Even if the note is produced, then demand proof that possession existed when the Notice of Default was entered. And even if possession existed properly at all times, endorsement and negotiability must be proper and timely. When was the note endorsed? Who was it endorsed to. Is there an agency relationship between the foreclosing agent and endorsee? Is the endorsement in blank? If there is no endorsement, is there a purchase and sale agreement that gives Holder rights, and did it exist prior to the Notice of Default?
California Civil Code §2924f (b)(1) states, "before any sale of property
can be made under the power of sale contained in any deed of trust or
mortgage…notice of the sale thereof shall be given by posting a written
notice…describing the property to be sold, at least 20 days before the date of
sale…and publishing a copy once a week for three consecutive calendar weeks,
the first publication to be at least 20 days before the date of sale…The notice of
sale shall contain…the name of the original trustor".
I've written a series of letter to RECONTRUST that address some of these issues but is very specific to my loan. You can read those letters here:
My recent letter to BofA (Part 2) Another thing you can do is dispute the validity of the debt. You will find that letter in the link above.
Bookmarks