Safe Loan Modification Service
Stop Foreclosure Now!
Don't Walk Away
Take The Survey

 


  
Go Back   Home Loan, Loan Modification & Foreclosure Help Forum - Loan Safe > Homeowner Foreclosure Toolbox > Foreclosure Laws

Foreclosure Laws This section is dedicated to the various foreclosure laws to help you understand the legal process.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Recourse v. Non-Recourse States
  #1 (permalink)   IP: 68.166.37.84
Old 08-04-2008, 08:02 AM
Professor Shays Professor Shays is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 49er Gold Country
Posts: 500
Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute Professor Shays has a reputation beyond repute
Recourse v. Non-Recourse States

The following article provides a summary of non-recourse mortgage states and anti-deficiency statutes. This may prove helpful for participants.

Daniel


List of Non-Recourse Mortgage States and Anti-Deficiency Statutes
In a non-recourse mortgage state, borrowers are not held personally liable for more than the home’s value at the time that the loan is repaid. The lender may recoup some of its loss through foreclosure. However, the lender may not sue the borrower for additional funds. If the foreclosure sale does not generate enough money to satisfy the loan, the lender must accept the loss.

Each non-recourse state has its own anti-deficiency statutes that prohibit lenders from seeking judgments. In a few cases, anti-deficiency statues do allow lenders to collect a limited amount of money from the borrower (such as the difference between the debt and the fair market value of the property).
Note that in some states (such as California) non-recourse laws apply only to “purchase money” loans (i.e. original home loans that are used to purchase property). Almost all HELOCs and home equity loans are considered recourse loans and lenders for these loans may sue borrowers to recoup loss. (Except in some cases where the second mortgage lender forces the foreclosure. See: HELOC Foreclosures). There has been some speculation that mortgage refinances do not constitute “purchase money” loans. However, there have been no cases to determine this issue one way or the other.

Anti-Deficiency / Non-Recourse States
Alaska
Arizona
California
Connecticut
Florida
Idaho
Minnesota
North Carolina
North Dakota
Texas
Utah
Washington

One Action States
In some states, lenders are only permitted a single lawsuit to collect mortgage debt. This plays out differently depending on the state’s laws. In New York, for example, a lender must choose between the actions of foreclosing on the property or suing to collect the debt. The following states have some type of one action statute:

California
Idaho
Montana
Nevada
New York
Utah
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Re: Recourse v. Non-Recourse States
  #2 (permalink)   IP: 68.229.7.251
Old 08-11-2008, 07:20 PM
racoon racoon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 51
racoon is on a distinguished road
Re: Recourse v. Non-Recourse States

Prof. Shays,

I am in NV. Does this mean if the bank does a trustee sale they will not seek a deficiency? How about the second? If a bank does a charge off on the second what are their options to collect the debt. Is wage garnishment a possibility.

Currently I only know that the second has done a charge off and sent the balance to collections. I am debating at this point whether to go to a BK attorney. At this point, what will I lose... I already have a foreclosure and a very nice rental house to live in! Just trying to make the best of the American Nightmare.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Re: Recourse v. Non-Recourse States
  #3 (permalink)   IP: 72.223.19.21
Old 10-07-2008, 10:17 PM
FacingNorth FacingNorth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 43
FacingNorth is on a distinguished road
Re: Recourse v. Non-Recourse States

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor Shays View Post
There has been some speculation that mortgage refinances do not constitute “purchase money” loans. However, there have been no cases to determine this issue one way or the other.
So are lots of people currently walking away from homes in non-recourse states like AZ even if they've already refinanced their original purchase money loans? With the market I'll probably have to walk away, but I'm in the process of applying for a write down. If I get an offer, I thought I'd have to choose between doing a refi and walking away, but after reading this I'm wondering if it would be worth a gamble to do the refi and then walk if I need to down the road.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 AM. Mark Forums Read | View Forum Leaders
Contact Us - Home Mortgage - Archive Privacy Statement Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 Copyright 2008 LoanSafe.org and MHL Pro Inc. All Rights Reserved. Home Loan, Loan Modification & Foreclosure Help Forum - Loan Safe

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46