Thanks, Flip
There is going to be a hearing tomorrow with all the lawyers present regarding my home invasion lawsuit (the foreclosure lawsuit which was filed a month after my home invasion is a separate case, and it looks like the bargain-basement foreclosure mill which is handling that is laying low until my invasion lawsuit is dealt with.) I want it to hurry up and go to court, but my lawyer says the other side will drag it out. The opposing lawyers are arguing that my case doesn't have "merit" because lenders/servicers have language in the loan documents which allow them to enter and inspect property of which they are lienholder, and they can "secure" the property if it is abandoned.
My property has never been abandoned nor neglected, and it is debatable as to what the interlopers actually "inspected". My financial documents, it looks like. And my feminine hygiene products.
Wells Fraudgo used these same arguments in the Tyson case:
Law.com - Bank's Behavior in Foreclosure Leads to Fine
...And look where it got them.
My attorney says, "A Florida judge may not be so partial to a borrower in this state" but that's a chance I'll be glad to take. It doesn't appear that Wells is appealing the $155,000.00 fine (my lawyer says they consider it "peanuts".)
When all this started in November 2009, all I wanted was a deed in lieu. I was willing to eat the $32,000.00 I put down on the house. But Fannie Mae, who is seriously in the red and is using tax payer money to pay executive compensation and operating expenses, is willing to pay money to expensive lawyers to take from me what I am willing to just give them for free.
I don't think it is a deficiency judgement which is driving this, I think this is pure inefficiency. If they try for a judgement I could file for a BK so fast their heads would spin. If Wells thinks 155K is "peanuts", then I think they know they won't be able to pay for too many company perks with the 60K they could try to get from little 'ol me.
Also, I still work in the financial industry (albeit a more reputable one) and we think that the opposing lawyers are banking on the fact that I won't want this case to go so far that my employers consider me an embarrassment. F* that - my manager already know about my court case, and if I lose my job, I think I can work in my other profession (nursing)