Federal Reserve Stimulus Program Aims to Fire Up Housing Market

By | September 14, 2012

(Source: Don Lee and Jim Puzzanghera Los Angeles Times (MCT) — The Federal Reservetook its strongest step to date to try to bolster the sluggish U.S. job market, launching a new stimulus program aimed at firing up one of the economy’s long-idled engines: the housing market.

The central bank said it would immediately start buying billions of dollars of mortgage-backed securities — essentially bonds that are made up of a bunch of home loans, packaged and then sold to investors.

And in an unexpected move, the Fed left the program open-ended and said it was prepared to do even more “if the outlook for the labor market does not improve substantially.”

The Fed’s hope is that heavy intervention in the real estate market would push already historically low mortgage rates down further for a longer period, spurring refinancing activity and home sales.

Although many analysts doubt this new round of bond buying will have a big effect on the economy — even Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke repeatedly cautioned against expecting too much — the central bank’s statement Thursday sent stocks soaring to fresh multiyear highs.

The Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard & Poor’s 500 index reached their highest levels since December 2007, and the tech-laden Nasdaq composite index saw its highest close since November 2000.

The Fed also extended its pledge to keep short-term interest rates near zero through the middle of 2015, another effort to entice businesses to step up hiring.

“The employment situation … remains a grave concern,” Bernanke said at a news conference Thursday shortly after the Fed issued its policy statement and downgraded its outlook for economic growth this year. “While the economy appears to be on a path of moderate recovery, it isn’t growing fast enough to make significant progress reducing the unemployment rate.”

The jobless rate has been stuck above 8% since the start of the year, and the Fed’s new forecast doesn’t see that changing any time soon. Bernanke would not give a specific level of unemployment that the Fed was targeting but said: “We’re looking for something that involves unemployment coming down in a sustained way.”

Bernanke has been hinting for weeks that more bond-buying was likely to come. But it wasn’t a certainty given there are some signs of a pickup in the economy, dissension inside the Fed boardroom and considerable political pressure from congressional Republicans not to do anything more.

GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney was among those who have voiced opposition to further monetary stimulus for the economy. Republican lawmakers repeatedly have warned of the risks of igniting inflation and asset bubbles, and they strongly opposed the Fed’s announcement Thursday.

Romney said the Fed plan showed that President Obama‘s economic policies aren’t working. The Republican candidate reiterated that, if elected, he would not reappoint Bernanke as Fed chairman when his term expires in early 2014.

“I think printing more money, at this point, comes at a higher cost than the benefit it’s going to create,” Romney said in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos.

Bernanke, in response to a question that the timing of the action could be construed by some as helping Obama, insisted that the election was no factor in the Fed’s decision.

“On the politics, we have tried very, very hard, and I think we’ve been successful, at the Federal Reserve to be nonpartisan and apolitical,” he said. “We make our decisions based entirely on the state of the economy and the needs of the economy for policy accommodation, so we just don’t take those factors into account.”

Adding to the controversy is the nature of the new bond-buying program itself. In opting to buy mortgage-backed securities instead of Treasury bonds, which were the focus of its second round of quantitative easing, the Fed is targeting a specific sector: the housing market.

Some inside and outside the Fed have questioned whether such sector-specific policy action was appropriate for the central bank because such moves are seen as the province of Congress and the president.

“Is it monetary policy or fiscal policy?” asked Dean Croushore, a former Fed economist who is currently an economics professor at the University of Richmond. “They’re favoring the housing industry over other industries…. What’s the limit of that? It’s kind of a dangerous place for the Fed to be in.”

More significantly for the economy, the main question is: How much punch will the new stimulus have?

Under the plan, the Fed would begin buying $40 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities a month. Combining the new bond buying with previously existing programs, the Fed said it would increase the central bank’s holdings of longer-term securities about $85 billion a month through the end of the year.

The Fed noted in its statement that the long-depressed housing market was improving. And Bernanke said: “I’m hopeful that we’ll see continued progress in the housing market. That has been one of the missing pistons in the engine here. Housing is usually a big part of a recovery process.”

Housing experts said the Fed’s actions to lower mortgage rates will help heal the housing market, but not by much.

“Don’t expect to see a sudden turnaround in Atlanta because of this,” said Richard K. Green, director of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, pointing to one of the worst housing markets in the nation.

The main problem for people who want to buy a house is coming up with the down payment, and lower mortgage rates don’t directly help that, Green said.

“The constraint is not anymore whether people can afford to buy a house,” Green added. “House prices are down so much and rates are so low. It’s the down payment.” And analysts say that will depend to a large extent on stronger job and income growth.

Nor do experts see a big surge in refinancing activity any time soon.

The Fed’s new round of bond buying could take mortgage rates — this week at 3.55% for the average 30-year fixed loan — down an additional 0.25 of a percentage point, said Arvind Krishnamurthy, a Northwestern University finance professor.

But only a tiny fraction of households will be able to take advantage of that, he said. In part, that’s because lenders are accepting mostly borrowers with relatively high credit ratings.

Bernanke said he expected some increase in refinancing, but the real boost would be from home sales.

“It’s the purchases of new homes that generate the construction activity, the furnishing, all those things that help the economy grow,” he said.

At the same time, Bernanke acknowledged that Fed policies were no panacea for the troubled job market. He prodded Congress and the White House to resolve the “fiscal cliff” — tax increases and spending cuts that will go into effect without congressional action — and other issues to help lift the cloud of uncertainty that has been contributing to weak hiring by employers.

“We’ll do our part, and we’ll try to make sure that unemployment moves in the right direction,” Bernanke said. “But we can’t solve this problem by ourselves.”

don.lee@latimes.com

jim.puzzanghera@latimes.com

———

©2012 the Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Source: Don Lee and Jim Puzzanghera Los Angeles Times (MCT)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *